Call us now! 888-293-0396

Identity Theft

In today's digital age, where personal information is often just a click away, identity theft has become an increasingly prevalent issue, affecting the lives of countless individuals. If you find yourself facing identity theft charges, you are likely aware of the serious legal consequences and the impact it can have on your life.

This is why it is essential to have the right legal representation by your side to navigate the complex legal landscape and safeguard your rights. At Desert Defense Lawyers, our team of criminal defense attorneys in Palm Desert understands the challenges and uncertainties you may be experiencing. We are here to help you make informed decisions and secure the best possible outcome for your case.

What is Identity Theft?

Identity theft is a criminal act in which an individual intentionally acquires, uses, or possesses someone else's personal and confidential information, typically for fraudulent purposes. This stolen information can include a wide range of details, such as a person's name, social security number, financial account information, credit card numbers, and more.

Identity thieves use this stolen information to commit various fraudulent activities, including the following:

  • Financial fraud — Criminals can use stolen identities to access and drain bank accounts, make unauthorized credit card purchases, or obtain loans and financial services in the victim's name.
  • Tax fraud — Identity thieves may file fraudulent tax returns using the victim's personal information to claim tax refunds, causing financial harm and inconvenience to the victim.
  • Medical identity theft — Perpetrators can use stolen personal information to receive medical treatment, prescriptions, or medical services in the victim's name, potentially leading to inaccurate medical records and billing issues for the victim.
  • Criminal activities — In some cases, identity theft is used to create fake identities for criminal purposes, such as evading law enforcement or committing crimes under another person's name.
  • Employment fraud — Identity thieves may use the stolen information to secure employment, potentially affecting the victim's tax status and reputation.

What the Prosecutor Must Prove

In a criminal identity theft case, the prosecutor must prove several key elements beyond a reasonable doubt to secure a conviction. These elements typically include the following:

  • Intent.
  • Identification of the victim.
  • Unauthorized use of personal information.
  • Unlawful gain or damage.

The burden of proof rests with the prosecution, and they must present a compelling case that establishes the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Defense strategies often involve challenging the evidence and disputing one or more of these key elements to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the judge or jury.

Here is a brief discussion of each of these elements:


The element of "intent" is a crucial component in cases involving identity theft and other criminal offenses. In the context of identity theft, intent refers to the mental state of the defendant and whether they knowingly and purposely engaged in activities to steal and use someone else's personal information for fraudulent purposes.

Identity theft typically requires a specific intent, meaning that the defendant must have had a clear and deliberate purpose to commit the crime. This goes beyond mere negligence or accidental use of someone's personal information.

To prove intent, the prosecution must establish that the defendant was aware of the wrongful nature of their actions. This includes demonstrating that the defendant knew they were using someone else's personal information without authorization and with the intent to commit fraud.

In some cases, the prosecution may introduce evidence of motive to support the argument of intent. Motive can help establish why the defendant would have a reason to engage in identity theft, such as financial gain or the desire to evade legal consequences for other activities.

Intent can be challenging to prove directly, so prosecutors often rely on circumstantial evidence. This may include the defendant's actions, statements, or digital trails that suggest a deliberate intention to commit identity theft. Defense strategies may focus on disputing the defendant's intent by arguing that their actions were accidental, lacked the necessary knowledge, or that there was no specific intent to commit fraud.

Note that the burden of proof for establishing intent rests with the prosecution, and they must present a strong case to convince the judge or jury that the defendant had the requisite intent to commit identity theft. A successful defense may involve introducing reasonable doubt about the defendant's mental state, thereby weakening the case for intent and potentially leading to a reduced or dismissed charge.

Identification of the Victim

This element requires the prosecution to establish the identity of the person whose personal information was stolen or misused. The victim in an identity theft case is typically the individual whose personal information has been stolen or fraudulently used. This information can include their name, social security number, driver's license number, financial account details, and other identifying data.

To identify the victim, the prosecution may rely on witness testimony, especially from the victims themselves. The victim may be asked to testify about the theft of their personal information and any resulting fraudulent activities.

In many cases, documentary evidence is used to confirm the victim's identity. This can include financial records, credit reports, medical bills, tax records, and other official documents that tie the personal information to the victim.

In cases of online identity theft, digital trails may be used to link the stolen information to the victim. This could include IP addresses, login credentials, or electronic communication that connects the defendant's actions to the victim's identity. In some cases, forensic experts may be involved in analyzing digital or physical evidence that ties the identity theft to a specific victim.

Prosecutors must also maintain a clear and unbroken chain of custody for the evidence. This is crucial to ensure its integrity and establish the victim's identity conclusively.

Proving the identification of the victim is essential because it not only demonstrates that a crime was committed but also connects the defendant's actions to a specific individual who has suffered harm as a result. Without this element, it would be challenging for the prosecution to establish the crime of identity theft.

Proving the victim's identity is typically straightforward when the victim cooperates with law enforcement and provides evidence. However, challenges can arise in cases where the victim is unaware of the theft, uncooperative, or difficult to locate. In such instances, the prosecution may rely more on digital or circumstantial evidence to establish the victim's identity.

Unauthorized Use of Personal Information

The element of "unauthorized use of personal information" is a critical component in proving identity theft in a criminal case. It involves demonstrating that the defendant used someone else's personal information without their consent or authorization for fraud.

To establish this element, the prosecution must show that the defendant engaged in the use of the victim's personal information without the victim's knowledge or permission. The use can encompass various actions, such as opening accounts, making purchases, applying for loans, or any other activity that involves the misuse of the stolen information.

The unauthorized use must be tied to fraudulent or criminal activities. It is not enough to prove that the defendant accessed the victim's information; the prosecution must also demonstrate that the information was used to commit illegal acts, such as financial fraud, tax fraud, or other deceptive actions.

The personal information used without authorization typically includes details like the victim's name, social security number, date of birth, driver's license number, financial account information, credit card numbers, and other identifying data. The use of personal information must be accompanied by an intent to commit fraud, harm, or other illegal activities. In other words, the defendant must have knowingly engaged in actions with the purpose of causing harm or gaining an unlawful advantage.

Proving unauthorized use of personal information can be complex in some cases, as it may require a thorough examination of the defendant's actions, digital records, and correspondence. The defense may attempt to argue that the use was authorized or that the defendant lacked the necessary knowledge or intent for fraudulent activity.

Additionally, prosecutors must demonstrate a direct connection between the defendant's actions and the unauthorized use of personal information. This can involve linking the defendant to specific financial transactions, accounts, or actions that were carried out using the stolen data.

Unlawful Gain or Damage

This element requires the prosecution to demonstrate that the defendant's actions, which involved the unauthorized use of someone else's personal information, resulted in either unlawful financial gain for the defendant or harm to the victim. The prosecution must establish that the defendant received some form of financial benefit due to their actions.

This gain may involve direct monetary profits, such as funds obtained through fraudulent transactions, or other advantages, such as access to goods or services. In addition to unlawful gain for the defendant, the prosecution must also show that the victim suffered harm as a consequence of the identity theft.

This harm can take various forms, including financial losses, damage to credit history, emotional distress, legal troubles, or inconvenience caused by rectifying the fraudulent activities. To prove this element, there should be a direct connection between the defendant's unauthorized use of personal information and the unlawful gain they received or the harm suffered by the victim.

The prosecution must demonstrate that the defendant's actions were a significant factor in causing the harm or facilitating the gain. Proving unlawful gain or damage can be challenging, as it requires establishing a clear cause-and-effect relationship between the defendant's actions and the consequences experienced by the victim.

In some cases, it may be necessary to trace financial transactions, review credit reports, and gather witness testimonies to support this element. Defense strategies may involve disputing the direct causation, arguing that the defendant's actions did not lead to the alleged harm or gain or that the harm was not a result of the identity theft.

The Penalties for Identity Theft

The penalties for identity theft in California can vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case, the severity of the offense, and the defendant's prior criminal record. Identity theft is generally covered under California Penal Code Section 530.5.

The criminal offense of identity theft is categorized as a wobbler. This means the prosecutor can charge it as a felony or a misdemeanor.

If the identity theft involves fewer than ten victims, and the total value of the stolen property or services is $950 or less, it may be charged as a misdemeanor. Penalties can include up to one year in county jail or a fine of up to $1,000.

When the identity theft involves ten or more victims, or the value of the stolen property or services exceeds $950, it is generally charged as a felony. Felony penalties can include 16 months to three years in state prison or fines of up to $10,000. The exact sentence can vary based on the severity of the offense.

If the defendant uses the stolen identity for certain serious crimes, such as terrorism or a sex offense, they may face additional penalties for aggravated identity theft. This can result in enhanced sentencing.

In addition to the criminal penalties, a defendant convicted of identity theft may be ordered to pay restitution to the victim to compensate for financial losses and damages suffered. Sometimes, a defendant may be granted probation instead of serving time in jail or prison. The terms of probation may include restitution to the victim, mandatory identity theft education programs, and other conditions.

Note that California also has specific laws addressing various forms of identity theft, such as financial identity theft, credit card fraud, and the fraudulent use of someone's personal identifying information. The penalties can differ based on the type and severity of the offense. Additionally, previous convictions and the defendant's criminal history can impact the sentencing. Suppose you or someone you know is facing identity theft charges in California. In that case, it is crucial to consult with a criminal defense attorney who can provide legal guidance and representation to navigate the legal process effectively.

Legal Defenses to Identity Theft

Defending against identity theft charges requires a careful examination of the specific circumstances of the case. While each case is unique, several common legal defenses may be used in identity theft cases, including the following:

  • Lack of intent — If the defendant did not have the intent to commit identity theft and can demonstrate that their actions were accidental, mistaken, or lacked the necessary knowledge of wrongdoing, this defense may be employed.
  • False accusations — In some cases, individuals may be wrongly accused of identity theft due to mistaken identity or misunderstandings. Providing evidence to show that someone else was responsible for the fraudulent activities can be a viable defense.
  • Consent — If the defendant had consent or authorization from the alleged victim to use their personal information, they may argue that their actions were legal and not unauthorized.
  • Mistaken identity — In situations where the defendant is wrongly identified as the perpetrator, proving that they were not the person who committed the identity theft can be a defense.
  • Alibi — An alibi defense involves proving that the defendant was not present at the location or time of the alleged identity theft, making it physically impossible for them to have committed the crime.
  • No unlawful gain or harm — If the prosecution fails to prove that the defendant's actions resulted in unlawful gain or harm to the victim, the defense may argue that the element of unlawful gain or damage has not been met.
  • Fourth Amendment violations — Challenging the legality of search and seizure procedures may be a defense if evidence against the defendant was obtained without a proper warrant or consent.
  • Chain of custody issues — If the prosecution cannot establish a proper chain of custody for the evidence, it may weaken the case against the defendant.
  • Insufficient evidence — Arguing that the prosecution lacks sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is a common defense strategy.
  • Plea bargaining — In some cases, negotiation with the prosecution for a plea deal, which may result in reduced charges or penalties, can be a pragmatic defense strategy.
  • Illegal interrogation or confession — If the defendant's rights were violated during questioning, such as not being informed of their Miranda rights, any resulting statements or confessions may be inadmissible in court.
  • Statute of limitations — In certain cases, identity theft charges may be subject to a statute of limitations. If the prosecution exceeds the allowed time, the defense may argue that the charges should be dismissed.

The specific defense strategy used will depend on the facts of the case, the evidence available, and the expertise of the defense attorney. It is essential to consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney who can assess the details of the case and determine the most effective defense strategy.

Find a Palm Desert Criminal Defense Lawyer Near Me

The legal ramifications of being charged with the criminal offense of identity theft can be overwhelming. This is why you require a solid defense strategy.

At Desert Defense Lawyers, our dedicated team of criminal defense attorneys in Palm Desert is here to guide you through this challenging process, protect your rights, and build a robust defense on your behalf. If you or someone you know is facing identity theft charges, do not face this battle alone. Call us today at 888-293-0396 to discuss your case and explore your legal options.




Call 760-610-6109 So We Can Discuss Your Case

Contact Us

Our legal team handles a wide range of criminal court cases, including:

  • Drunk in Public
  • Domestic Violence
  • Drug Crimes
  • Prop 47 Cases
  • Expungements
  • Evading Arrest
  • Juvenile Crimes
  • Probation Violations
  • Traffic Offenses
  • Theft Crimes
  • Violent Crimes
  • Weapons Charges
  • White Collar Crimes